Back to All Methodologies
New Zealand, 1960s

Lydiard Method

by Arthur Lydiard

Periodized training system emphasizing a long aerobic base phase followed by hill work, anaerobic training, and race-specific sharpening

BEST FOR
Marathon, Half Marathon, 10K
LEVEL
Intermediate, Advanced, Elite
ATHLETES
3+ Champions
PHASES
4 Training Phases

About the Creator

Arthur Leslie Lydiard (1917-2004) was a New Zealand running coach who revolutionized distance running training. Born in Auckland, Lydiard was a self-coached marathon runner who experimented extensively with training methods in the 1940s-50s. After struggling with inconsistent performance, he discovered that building a massive aerobic base through high-mileage easy running, followed by systematic sharpening phases, produced breakthrough results.

Lydiard's coaching career took off in the 1960s when he coached New Zealand's legendary middle-distance runners to Olympic glory. His athletes won multiple Olympic medals at the 1960 Rome Olympics (Peter Snell - 800m gold, Murray Halberg - 5000m gold) and 1964 Tokyo Olympics (Peter Snell - 800m and 1500m double gold). This success catapulted Lydiard to international fame, and he spent decades traveling the world consulting for national programs in Finland, Mexico, Venezuela, and Japan.

Lydiard's philosophy centered on the idea that all distance runners, from 800m to marathon, benefit from the same foundational aerobic conditioning. He believed that "marathon training for all" built the necessary aerobic engine, which could then be refined with shorter, faster training for specific race distances. His systematic periodization model - base, hill work, track sharpening, racing - became the blueprint that nearly all modern distance training follows.

His legacy lives on through coaches worldwide who adopted and adapted his principles. Lydiard authored several influential books and continued coaching and consulting until his death in 2004. He is widely regarded as one of the most influential running coaches in history, with his methods forming the foundation of modern distance running training.

Historical Context

The Lydiard Method emerged in the late 1950s and early 1960s, a time when distance running training was largely unscientific and based on high-intensity interval work popularized by coaches like Franz Stampfl (who coached Roger Bannister). Runners trained primarily with hard track intervals, believing that racing speed could only be developed by running fast in training. This led to frequent injuries, burnout, and inconsistent performances.

Lydiard challenged this paradigm through personal experimentation. As a marathon runner in his 30s, he found that building enormous aerobic capacity through 100+ mile weeks of easy running, followed by short phases of intense speedwork, produced far better results than constant hard training. When his protégés Peter Snell, Murray Halberg, and Barry Magee dominated at the 1960 Rome Olympics, the running world took notice. Suddenly, the revolutionary idea that 'easy running makes you fast' had undeniable proof.

This methodology solved the problem of how to develop both the aerobic endurance and the speed necessary for championship racing. It demonstrated that these qualities could be developed sequentially and systematically, rather than simultaneously. The Lydiard system also dramatically reduced injury rates and allowed athletes to sustain high-level training for years. His influence spread globally, particularly to Japan where his methods helped create a distance running powerhouse, and to the United States where coaches like Bill Bowerman adopted and modified his principles.

Scientific Basis

The Lydiard Method is grounded in fundamental aerobic physiology. The long aerobic base phase (8-12 weeks of high-mileage, easy-paced running) triggers profound physiological adaptations: increased mitochondrial density in muscle cells (30-40% increases documented), enhanced capillary networks for oxygen delivery, improved fat oxidation capacity, and greater aerobic enzyme production. These adaptations create the 'aerobic engine' that powers all distance running performance.

Research has validated Lydiard's intuitive understanding that aerobic development requires sustained, moderate-intensity training at or below the aerobic threshold (roughly 70-80% max heart rate). Training at this intensity maximizes aerobic adaptations while minimizing stress and recovery demands, allowing for the high training volumes (70-100+ miles per week) that drive fitness gains. Studies show that elite distance runners possess exceptional mitochondrial density and oxidative capacity, adaptations best developed through Lydiard-style base training.

The subsequent phases of the Lydiard system address other performance determinants. Hill training develops leg strength and power without the pounding of track intervals. The anaerobic/track phase improves VO2max, lactate threshold, and neuromuscular coordination at race pace. Finally, the racing/peaking phase allows for recovery and freshness while maintaining sharpness through race-pace work and actual competitions. This periodized approach aligns with exercise science principles of specificity and progressive overload, building general fitness first, then race-specific qualities.

Core Principles

1

Long aerobic base building phase (8-12 weeks)

2

High weekly mileage at conversational pace

3

Periodization: Base → Hill Training → Track Sharpening → Racing

4

Progressive long runs on weekends

5

Minimal speed work during base phase

6

Hill circuit training for strength

7

Fresh legs approach - adequate recovery

Training Phases

Base Building

8-12 weeks
Focus: Aerobic development

High volume easy running to build aerobic capacity and endurance

KEY WORKOUTS:Long runsEasy runsStrides

Hill Circuit Training

4-6 weeks
Focus: Strength and power

Repetition running on hills to build leg strength and power

KEY WORKOUTS:Hill circuitsEasy runsLong run

Track Sharpening

4-6 weeks
Focus: Speed and anaerobic capacity

Track intervals and speed work to develop racing speed

KEY WORKOUTS:Track intervalsTime trialsEasy runs

Racing/Peaking

4-8 weeks
Focus: Race-specific preparation

Reduced volume with race-pace work and actual races

KEY WORKOUTS:Race pace runsRacesEasy runs

Strengths

Builds exceptional aerobic base - the foundation for all endurance performance

Reduces injury risk through gradual progression and emphasis on easy running

Develops mental toughness through long runs and high weekly volume

Clear periodization structure makes planning straightforward

Proven track record with Olympic and world-class athletes

Sustainable long-term - athletes can train this way for years without burnout

Addresses all performance components systematically (endurance, strength, speed)

Weekend long runs build both physiological and psychological endurance

Hill phase builds strength without excessive pounding

Fresh legs philosophy prevents chronic fatigue and overtraining

Limitations

Requires significant time commitment (10+ hours/week for proper implementation)

Long base phase may feel monotonous for runners craving variety or speed

High volume may not suit masters runners or those with injury history

Less suitable for 5K and shorter distances where speed is more critical

Risk of boredom during 8-12 weeks of exclusively easy running

Weekend long run doubles demand serious time allocation

May be too aggressive for runners with less than 2 years of consistent training

Requires discipline to keep base phase truly easy (many runners run too hard)

High mileage increases musculoskeletal stress despite easy pace

Not ideal for time-crunched runners or those limited to 4-5 days/week

Famous Athletes

Peter Snell

Achievements: Won 800m gold at 1960 Rome Olympics, then 800m and 1500m double gold at 1964 Tokyo Olympics. Set world records at 800m, 880y, mile, and 1500m.
Training Approach: Snell followed Lydiard's marathon-based training despite being a middle-distance runner. He ran 100-mile weeks during base training, including long runs of 20+ miles. This massive aerobic base gave him devastating finishing speed in championship races. His ability to excel at both 800m and 1500m demonstrated the versatility of the Lydiard approach.
Impact: Snell's success proved that even middle-distance runners benefit from marathon-style training, revolutionizing 800m/1500m preparation worldwide.

Murray Halberg

Achievements: Won 5000m gold at 1960 Rome Olympics. Set world records at 2 miles and 3 miles. Won three consecutive Commonwealth Games gold medals.
Training Approach: Despite having a withered left arm from a rugby injury, Halberg used Lydiard's high-volume training to build exceptional endurance. His trademark tactic was a devastating 600m surge with 3 laps to go, made possible by his superior aerobic capacity from 100+ mile weeks.
Impact: Halberg demonstrated that physical limitations could be overcome through superior fitness built on Lydiard's aerobic foundation.

Rod Dixon

Achievements: Olympic bronze at 1500m (1972), won 1983 NYC Marathon (2:08:59), set world record for 5000m.
Training Approach: Dixon successfully transitioned from world-class track to elite marathon using Lydiard principles throughout his career. His marathon success in his 30s showcased the longevity and adaptability of the Lydiard system.
Impact: Proved the Lydiard method works across all distances and throughout an athlete's career.

How It Compares to Other Methods

Compared to Jack Daniels' VDOT system, Lydiard emphasizes intuitive, time-based training over precise pace calculations. While Daniels prescribes specific paces for five training zones, Lydiard advocates for 'effort-based' easy running and racing-based speedwork. The Lydiard base phase is longer (8-12 weeks vs 4-6 weeks in most Daniels plans) and typically involves higher mileage.

Relative to Pfitzinger's method, Lydiard delays lactate threshold work until after the base and hill phases, whereas Pfitzinger incorporates tempo runs throughout training. Lydiard's approach is more sequential (aerobic→strength→speed→racing), while Pfitzinger blends these qualities more continuously. Both emphasize high mileage, but Lydiard's weekend long run double is more demanding.

The Hanson Method's 'cumulative fatigue' philosophy contrasts sharply with Lydiard's 'fresh legs' approach. While Hansons schedule hard workouts on consecutive days and cap long runs at 16 miles, Lydiard insists on recovery between quality sessions and builds endurance through longer runs (2+ hours). Lydiard believes in developing maximum aerobic capacity before adding stress, while Hansons believe in training tired to simulate race conditions.

Research & Citations

Billat VL, et al. (2001)
Interval training for performance: a scientific and empirical practice
Sports Medicine

High-volume aerobic training increases mitochondrial density and oxidative enzyme capacity, supporting Lydiard's base phase philosophy

Seiler S, Tønnessen E (2009)
Intervals, thresholds, and long slow distance: the role of intensity and duration in endurance training
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Elite endurance athletes train approximately 80% of volume at low intensity, validating Lydiard's emphasis on easy running

Helgerud J, et al. (2007)
Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

While intervals improve VO2max, they require an aerobic base to be sustainable - supporting Lydiard's sequential approach

Recommended Reading

Running to the Top
by Arthur Lydiard & Garth Gilmour
1997

Lydiard's definitive guide to his training system

Lydiard Training System
by Arthur Lydiard
2006

Comprehensive overview of the complete Lydiard method

Running with Lydiard
by Arthur Lydiard & Garth Gilmour
1983

Practical application of Lydiard principles for runners of all levels

Modern Adaptations

Contemporary coaches have adapted Lydiard's principles for modern athletes. Many use abbreviated 6-8 week base phases rather than 10-12 weeks, recognizing that modern runners often maintain year-round fitness. Masters runners typically reduce volume by 20-30% while maintaining the periodization structure. The 'weekend long run double' has been modified to a single long run plus medium-long run for time-constrained athletes.

Coaches like Renato Canova have integrated Lydiard's base-building philosophy with more race-specific work earlier in the cycle, particularly for elite athletes who race frequently. The hill circuit phase has been adapted to include more varied hill workouts (short hills, long hills, bounded hills) beyond Lydiard's original circuit format.

The fundamental insight - that aerobic base building must precede race-specific sharpening - remains universally accepted. Modern training plans across all methodologies incorporate elements of Lydiard's periodization, making his influence nearly universal even when his name isn't mentioned. Online coaching platforms have made Lydiard-style training more accessible, with many offering structured 'base-building' phases before marathon or half-marathon build-ups.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Running base phase miles too fast - defeats the purpose of aerobic development

Skipping or shortening the base phase to get to 'fun' speed work sooner

Taking weekend long run doubles too literally - risking overtraining injury

Insufficient recovery between quality sessions in later phases

Attempting 100-mile weeks without proper build-up (should take years to reach)

Neglecting the hill phase or replacing it with track intervals

Poor execution of 'time on feet' concept - going too fast to sustain long duration

Not truly understanding 'effort-based' easy running - using pace instead of feel

Ready to Try This System?

Generate a personalized training plan based on the Lydiard Method

Generate Your Plan →